CAGI (the Compressed Air and Gas Institute) operates a voluntary programme where member manufacturers publish performance datasheets that are independently verified by Intertek. The purpose is to ensure that end users get what they pay for — a worthy objective that Mattei fully supports.
The challenge for Mattei is that CAGI's verification protocol tests machines only at zero hours. For most compressors, this is perfectly reasonable — their performance at zero hours is the best it will ever be. But Mattei machines are different: they demonstrably improve in efficiency over the first 500 hours of operation, as independently certified by Intertek — the very same laboratory CAGI uses for verification.
Mattei appealed to CAGI to allow the publication of 500-hour performance data alongside zero-hour data, so that end users could see the real-world performance they would experience over 10, 15, or 20 years of ownership. CAGI declined — their policy is zero-hour testing only.
This created an impossible situation. Under CAGI rules, Mattei was required to declare zero-hour performance figures that are deliberately conservative — knowing the machine would outperform those figures for the vast majority of its operating life. And if Mattei declared the actual performance the end user would experience (the improved 500-hour figures), the machine would risk failing CAGI's zero-hour verification test, with that failure published on CAGI's website.
In other words, the system required Mattei to publish performance data that understated the real efficiency the end user would receive. Mattei chose to step away from CAGI rather than continue publishing data that did not reflect the true performance of its machines.
Mattei's performance claims remain independently verified by Intertek — the same laboratory, the same rigour, the same standards. The improving performance story is not a marketing claim — it is a certified, measurable, repeatable fact that any end user can verify on their own machine.